Megaspeed probe follows reports linking Alice Huang to Nvidia

What Megaspeed said

The Megaspeed probe into news reports concerning its operations began after the cloud computing company confirmed that former executive Alice Huang left in 2025. According to CNBC Technology, Megaspeed said on 15 November 2026 that it brought in external lawyers to examine reports about its operations, supply chain and worldwide activities.

Megaspeed said Alice Huang departed on 30 August 2025 and has no current role with the company. It declined to discuss her personal and private matters. It also said the reports lack verifiable evidence.

The company said it will review the reporting and provide more information to stakeholders when appropriate. It said its controls are designed to meet applicable laws and regulatory regimes. Megaspeed has not disclosed any findings from the review.

Links to Nvidia and Jensen Huang

The reports connected former Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang with Alice Huang. CNBC reported that Jensen Huang resigned from Nvidia on 12 November 2026. His departure followed reports about relationships outside his marriage, including one that was reportedly with a direct report.

Jensen Huang said he was unfaithful following reports linking him to Alice Huang. Megaspeed said it would not comment on her personal and private matters. The company's statement focused on her employment status, not the allegations.

The New York Times reported that Alice Huang is believed by US intelligence officials to have links to Chinese intelligence. That claim is separate from Megaspeed's statement about her departure and the internal probe. The reports have increased scrutiny of Megaspeed because of the link between a former executive and the former Nvidia chief executive.

Cloud computing and chip supply chain

Megaspeed describes its role as a core partner in Nvidia's regional cloud computing power business. Customers can obtain processing capacity through Nvidia GPUs. GPUs are specialised chips that perform many calculations at once. They are designed for tasks that need many calculations at the same time.

The company's offices are in Singapore and Indonesia. It has faced questions before over whether chips supplied through its business were sent on to customers in China. That issue has drawn media and government attention.

The new probe shows that the company is now reviewing those reports through external legal counsel. Megaspeed has not provided details about the scope of the review beyond its operations, supply chain and worldwide activities. The company says its service allows customers to rent access to computing power rather than buy the chips directly.

Compliance claims and export controls

Megaspeed said its controls are designed to meet applicable laws and regulatory regimes. It pointed to US export control rules and local rules in every market where it operates. Export controls are government rules on technology transfers.

The company said it designs and maintains control frameworks for its operations and supply chain. It said the frameworks cover US export control requirements and local rules in each market. Megaspeed has not disclosed whether the review has found any problems.

The statement is relevant because Megaspeed rents access to Nvidia GPUs, which are specialised chips. The company says those chips are provided through a regional cloud service. The review will examine the reports that led to the investigation.

What happens next

The external review will examine the reports and Megaspeed's global operations. The company says it will share more information with stakeholders when appropriate. Megaspeed has not said when the review will be completed or named the external law firm.

The probe comes after Jensen Huang's resignation and reports about his personal conduct. Megaspeed has confirmed Alice Huang's departure and the investigation, while the wider allegations remain reported claims.

For now, the confirmed facts are limited to Megaspeed's statements and the reported resignation. Further details may follow if Megaspeed chooses to disclose them. The case shows how a corporate investigation can overlap with reports about personal conduct and chip supply chains.