SpaceX catches Starship booster and ship in first full tower return
For the first time, SpaceX brought both stages of a Starship rocket back to its launch tower, with the upper stage caught by the tower arms on Saturday evening at Starbase, Texas.

Key takeaways
- SpaceX caught the Starship upper stage with its launch tower arms on Saturday evening at Starbase, Texas, after a flight from orbit.
- Both stages of a Starship rocket have now been returned safely to the launch site, which Ars Technica calls a proof of concept.
- The company builds a new upper stage every three weeks and aims for 135 flights a year within a few years.
- The heat shield is likely to be the most difficult part of achieving rapid, routine reuse.
In this article
How the catch unfolded
On Saturday evening, SpaceX returned the upper stage of its Starship rocket to the launch tower at Starbase, Texas, and caught it with the tower's arms. According to Ars Technica, the ship came back from orbit under its own power after launching from the same site less than a day earlier.
The vehicle reappeared from a layer of clouds near the end of its descent, still flying on its side. In the final moments, three Raptor engines lit and the ship swung upright, then eased toward the tower. Two arms reached out and held it less than a minute after it came into view.
The report describes how narrow the margins were. Two small fittings on the sides of the rocket, each sticking out about one foot, were the only points of contact with the arms. The rocket had already orbited the planet several times before coming back.
A first for full reusability
SpaceX has landed rocket boosters before, often on floating platforms, and has flown astronauts with Crew Dragon. Catching an orbital upper stage with tower arms is new. The company had run several earlier practice descents that ended over the Indian Ocean before attempting the return.
Ars Technica notes that both parts of a Starship rocket have now come back safely to the launch site. Earlier flights had already demonstrated booster returns, so this flight completed the picture by bringing the ship home as well.
The publication frames the event as a proof of concept rather than routine operations. Landing a vehicle this large, coming back from orbit with enormous energy, remains a difficult task, and achieving a high success rate will take time.
Lessons from the Space Shuttle

The report sets the achievement against the history of the Space Shuttle, the reusable orbiter NASA built in the 1970s. The shuttles landed on runways but glided back without engine power, and their heat shields needed careful refurbishment after each mission.
Early projections for the shuttle did not hold up. NASA once hoped to carry dozens of people per flight at a cost as low as $25 per pound of cargo. In practice crews were limited to seven astronauts and costs were closer to $25,000 per pound. Only five orbiters that flew to space were ever built, and the programme made 135 flights over roughly 30 years.
By comparison, SpaceX wants Starship to fly far more often. Ars Technica reports that within a few years the company aims for 135 flights in a single year, and eventually thousands.
Building Starships at scale
Reusing a rocket only matters if new ones can be built quickly when needed. Ars Technica says SpaceX has five Starship upper stages in an advanced state of development at Starbase, with parts for about a dozen more inside its factory there.
The company currently completes a new upper stage every three weeks, according to the report. The factory was designed to eventually build one ship every three days. When Elon Musk described such targets in an interview five years ago, the report notes, the idea sounded far-fetched; it no longer does.
Why it matters
SpaceX's long-term goal is a rocket that can be flown, recovered, refuelled and flown again with little delay. Getting the whole vehicle back intact is the first step, and Saturday's catch showed the concept works. The heat shield, which must survive repeated reentries, is expected to be the hardest part of making rapid reuse practical.
If the company can repeat catches regularly, launch costs could fall and flight rates could rise in ways previous vehicles never managed. Ars Technica's view is that what looked remarkable this weekend may one day become routine. That outcome is not yet confirmed; it depends on how reliably future flights perform.
Sources
Spotted a mistake? See our corrections policy. Read how News by OnDevice works in our editorial policy.



